Caution: AMA Ponders Calling health and wellness care a ideal
Sharing is caring!
Condividere
Tweet
Condividere
The concept that healthcare is a ideal may noise kind as well as compassionate, however in truth it is self-serving to those who would revenue from huge government in medicine—either by winning elections or reaping the monetary benefits of the large programs it demands.
The American medical association (AMA) thought about Resolution 007, to choose whether health and wellness care is a human right, at its 2017 annual meeting.
Unlike the unalienable rights provided in our statement of Independence, a ideal to “health care” is not self-evident. The rights to life, liberty, as well as residential property ownership (or “pursuit of happiness”) are endowed by our Creator—not the AMA or the government. These rights belong similarly to all. My ideal to liberty does not reduce yours.
“Health care” is not like that. speaking against the Resolution, AMA delegate Dr. Ralph Kristeller of new jersey properly asserted that health and wellness care is a obligation of each individual. people need to establish great health and wellness routines of diet, exercise, avoiding substances that damage the mind as well as body, as well as avoiding risky behavior. getting early screening for deadly illness is likewise the obligation of the person who would get a lot of by early detection—the patient. seeking expert counsel—and complying with the advice—is likewise the patient’s responsibility.
Calling health and wellness care a human ideal is clearly misleading. It is normally taken to indicate medical services as well as repayment for these services.
Before huge government went into the medical arena in the U.S., there were lots of independent physicians in every town. In the 1950s, an office see was $10, as well as the physician earned a great living. When a kid ended up being ill, parents understood where to choose help, as well as repayment was a secondary consideration. lots of physicians waited for repayment or, understanding the family, provided the services for free. Hospitals were regional institutions, well established by the town fathers. They were operated as well as staffed by well-trained physicians as well as nurses, who took part in assisting the medical institutions train the next generation of professionals. Charity fundraisers as well as robust volunteer services kept the hospitals locations where generosity was the rule. medical care was local, as well as the federal government had no role.
Related fewer Sweets for a lot more protein this Holiday
In 1965, with the passage of Medicare as well as Medicaid, the significant infusion of taxpayer dollars triggered an explosion in the expense of hospitalizations, as well as the commoditization of medical services ensued. MBAs instead of retired physicians took over the administration of hospitals, as well as today they command seven-figure salaries. electronic medical records ended up being a automobile for exploiting the system in addition to for attempts to manage rampant fraud. Today, huge healthcare facility conglomerates are getting up independent medical methods to harness the profits as well as therefore manage what the physicians do for their patients.
Once a service, paid for by somebody else, is declared a “right,” it becomes promptly evident that it cannot be an unrestricted right, however only a insurance claim on those services deemed proper by authorities or planners. nor is everybody equal. whatever that is provided to some need to very first be taken from somebody else. My “right” to “health care” diminishes your ideal to liberty—such as your ideal to utilize your own incomes to get a medical service you requirement to protect your own life.
Medical services may be needed for those who are ill, however food, clothing, as well as shelter are needed for all. If these were declared to be rights, it would indicate everybody supply food, clothing, as well as shelter for each American: socialism in every part of the economy. exactly how much food? exactly how extravagant a wardrobe? exactly how huge a house? as well as exactly how much medical service can a resident demand from others? constant dispute as well as eventual lacks as well as impoverishment are guaranteed.
Instead of going over exactly how we can finest serve those who cannot pay for their own medical care, we are progressively vilifying medical expeRT che non forniscono ciò che il governo prescrive.
Snack sani correlati che i tuoi giovani adoreranno
Una risoluzione molto migliore per l’AMA sarebbe quella di informare il pubblico sulla verità che la cura della salute e del benessere è molto prima e soprattutto una responsabilità privata, nonché per sottoporre le terribili ramificazioni di dichiararlo come un diritto. Ora sta pensando se rivelare che questo diritto politico artificiale è un “diritto” recentemente trovato.
La dott.ssa Alieta Eck si è laureata presso il Rutgers College of Pharmacy e l’Istituto di medicina dell’Università di St. Louis a St. Louis,
Mo. Ha esaminato la medicina degli interni presso la struttura sanitaria della Robert Wood Johnson University nel New Brunswick, New Jersey, e è stato in metodo personale con suo marito, il Dr. John Eck, MD a Piscataway, New Jersey, considerando quel 1988, abilitableHealthInc.org. È stata inclusa nella riforma delle cure per la salute e il benessere considerando che la residenza e la residenza è persuasa che il governo è un cattivo fornitore di cure mediche.
Il Dr. Eck ha testimoniato davanti al comitato economico congiunto del Congresso degli Stati Uniti nel 2004 su metodi molto migliori per fornire cure mediche negli Stati Uniti. Nel 2011, ha testimoniato davanti a un comitato per la salute e il benessere del Senato presieduto dai senatori Bernie Sanders e da Rand Paul, sui metodi per prevenire i pronto soccorso non urgenti.
Nel 2003, lei e la sua altra metà hanno istituito lo Zarephath Health and Wellness Center, un centro gratuito non governativo per i cattivi e non assicurati che attualmente si prendono cura di circa 300 persone al mese utilizzando i servizi forniti di medici volontari e che infermieri. È aperto solo 12 ore settimanali. ZhCenter.org
Sta lavorando per passare NJ S239, una spesa che fornirebbe una sicurezza di negligenza medica per i metodi personali dei medici che donano 4 ore settimanali in un centro come lo ZHC. njaaps.org
Il dott. Eck è stato il presidente del 2012 dell’Associazione dei medici americani e dei chirurghi e fa parte del Board of Christian Care Medi-Share, un ministero delle spese mediche basata sulle credenze.
È stata candidata repubblicana per il Congresso degli Stati Uniti per NJ12 nel 2014.
Nel marzo 2015, ha presieduto un soddisfacente per la coalizione dei medici nazionali per la flessibilità in medicina, circa 30 medici, che si sono radunati a Washington, DC per redigere un “piano di una pagina” per riportare l’accessibilità, promuovere l’opzione individuale e mantenere Alta qualità nelle cure mediche. https://aaps.wufoo.com/forms/m11okp2x1yjc8qf/
Il Dr. Eck ha parlato al National Press Club di Washington, DC nel giugno 2016 per aiutare a svelare il cuneo della libertà di salute e benessere, uno sforzo del Consiglio dei cittadini per la libertà di salute e benessere, con il presidente Twila Brase. Jointhewedge.com
Link a questo post: ATTENZION
Confronto di canali radici correlati con le alternative
0/5
(0 recensioni)
La condivisione è la cura!
Condividere
Tweet
Condividere